When comparing the Canon R5 and R6 Mark II, it depends on your photography needs. The Canon R6 Mark II stands out with its faster autofocus, improved low-light performance, and more affordable price, making it ideal for photographers and videographers who want top-tier features without the premium cost. It’s perfect for capturing sharp images and smooth video in any setting.
The Canon R5 and R6 Mark II are both exceptional full-frame mirrorless cameras. While the Canon R5 excels in resolution with its 45MP sensor, the R6 Mark II’s versatility and speed make it a more practical choice for most users, especially those focused on action shots and video work.
Whichever mirrorless camera you choose, I highly recommend you to check the Black Friday Best Seller Featured Deals before it expires, that will never get you regret for your choose.
There are some logical factors thats why I recommend the Canon R6 Mark II, check it out below.
Why Do I Recommend Canon R6 Mark II
While both cameras are exceptional, the Canon R6 Mark II offers several compelling reasons to consider it over the R5:
- Improved Autofocus System: The R6 Mark II features an advanced AI-powered autofocus system that outperforms even the R5 in certain scenarios.
- Faster Continuous Shooting: With up to 40 fps electronic shutter and 12 fps mechanical shutter, the R6 Mark II is better suited for action and sports photography.
- Enhanced Video Capabilities: The R6 Mark II offers 4K60p oversampled from 6K, with no crop and unlimited recording time.
- More Affordable: The R6 Mark II comes at a significantly lower price point, making it more accessible to a wider range of photographers.
- Improved Battery Life: The R6 Mark II offers better battery performance, allowing for more shots per charge.
- Dual Card Slots: Like the R5, it features dual card slots for backup and flexibility.
- Compact and Lightweight: The R6 Mark II is slightly smaller and lighter than the R5, making it more portable for everyday use.
- Low-Light Performance: With a native ISO range of 100-102400 (expandable to 204800), the R6 Mark II excels in low-light situations.
- In-Body Image Stabilization: The R6 Mark II offers up to 8 stops of shake correction, matching the R5’s performance.
- RAW Burst Mode: The pre-shooting option in RAW burst mode allows you to capture moments that happened up to 0.5 seconds before pressing the shutter.
Canon R5 Vs R6 Mark II Side by Side Comparison
Features/Specification | Canon R5 | Canon R6 Mark II |
Sensor Resolution | 45 MP | 24.2 MP |
Continuous Shooting (Electronic) | 20 fps | 40 fps |
Continuous Shooting (Mechanical) | 12 fps | 12 fps |
Video Resolution | 8K30p, 4K120p | 4K60p, 1080p180 |
ISO Range (Native) | 100-51200 | 100-102400 |
Autofocus Points | 5940 | 4897 |
EVF Resolution | 5.76M dots | 3.69M dots |
LCD Screen | 3.2″ 2.1M dots | 3.0″ 1.62M dots |
Card Slots | 1x CFexpress, 1x SD UHS-II | 2x SD UHS-II |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 320 shots | 450 shots |
Weight | 738g | 670g |
Weather Sealing | Yes | Yes |
IBIS | Up to 8 stops | Up to 8 stops |
Price (Body Only) | Check Canon R5 Price | Check Canon R6 Mark II Price |
What can both do?
Both the Canon R5 and R6 Mark II are versatile cameras capable of handling a wide range of photography and videography tasks. Here’s a list of capabilities shared by both cameras:
- Capture high-quality still images in various formats, including RAW and JPEG.
- Record 4K video with high bit rates and professional color profiles.
- Utilize Canon’s Dual Pixel CMOS AF II system for fast and accurate autofocus.
- Track and focus on subjects’ eyes, faces, and bodies for both humans and animals.
- Shoot in challenging lighting conditions with high ISO capabilities.
- Stabilize images and video with in-body image stabilization (IBIS).
- Connect wirelessly via Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for remote shooting and file transfer.
- Use a wide range of RF lenses, as well as EF lenses with an adapter.
- Capture fast action with high-speed continuous shooting.
- Record audio via built-in microphones or external microphones through the 3.5mm jack.
- Output clean HDMI for external recording or monitoring.
- Customize button layouts and create personalized shooting modes.
- Geotag images with built-in GPS (when connected to a smartphone).
- Perform in-camera RAW processing and image editing.
- Utilize interval shooting for time-lapse photography.
- Employ focus stacking for increased depth of field in macro photography.
- Use advanced exposure modes, including Program AE, Shutter Priority, Aperture Priority, and Manual.
- Create multiple exposures in-camera.
- Utilize HDR shooting modes for high dynamic range images.
Similarities Between Canon R5 and R6 Mark II
Features/Specification | Canon R5 | Canon R6 Mark II |
Sensor Type | Full-frame CMOS | Full-frame CMOS |
Lens Mount | RF Mount | RF Mount |
Image Processor | DIGIC X | DIGIC X |
Autofocus System | Dual Pixel CMOS AF II | Dual Pixel CMOS AF II |
In-Body Image Stabilization | Yes, up to 8 stops | Yes, up to 8 stops |
Weather Sealing | Yes | Yes |
EVF Type | OLED | OLED |
Touch Screen | Yes | Yes |
Wi-Fi | Yes (2.4GHz, 5GHz) | Yes (2.4GHz, 5GHz) |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
USB Type | USB 3.2 Gen 2 | USB 3.2 Gen 2 |
HDMI Output | Full-size HDMI | Micro HDMI |
Microphone Input | 3.5mm Stereo | 3.5mm Stereo |
Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
Price | Check Canon R5 Price | Check Canon R6 Mark II Price |
Key specifications and features of both cameras, let’s delve deeper into how these differences translate into real-world performance and which camera might be best suited for different types of photographers and videographers.
Image Quality and Resolution: The Canon R5’s 45-megapixel sensor is a clear winner when it comes to resolution and detail. This makes it an excellent choice for landscape photographers, studio portrait shooters, and commercial photographers who need to produce large prints or heavily crop their images. The extra resolution also provides more flexibility in post-processing, allowing for aggressive cropping without significant loss of detail.
However, the R6 Mark II’s 24.2-megapixel sensor shouldn’t be underestimated. It strikes a great balance between resolution and file size, making it more manageable for everyday shooting and faster workflow. The lower pixel count also contributes to better low-light performance and less noticeable noise at higher ISOs.
Autofocus and Continuous Shooting: While both cameras feature Canon’s excellent Dual Pixel CMOS AF II system, the R6 Mark II takes the lead with its improved AI-based subject detection and tracking. It can recognize and track a wider variety of subjects, including vehicles and specific animals like horses and trains. This, combined with its blazing-fast 40 fps electronic shutter, makes the R6 Mark II a dream come true for sports and wildlife photographers.
The R5 is no slouch in this department, offering up to 20 fps with the electronic shutter and 12 fps with the mechanical shutter. However, for those who frequently shoot fast-moving subjects, the R6 Mark II’s advantages in autofocus and burst speed could be game-changing.
Video Capabilities: The Canon R5 made headlines with its 8K video recording capabilities, a feature that sets it apart not just from the R6 Mark II but from most cameras in its class. This, along with its ability to shoot 4K at up to 120 fps, makes it a powerhouse for videographers who need the absolute highest resolution and frame rates.
The R6 Mark II, while not offering 8K, brings significant improvements over its predecessor in the video department. It can now shoot 4K60p video oversampled from 6K, resulting in sharp, detailed footage. It also offers unlimited recording time in most modes, addressing one of the main criticisms of the original R6.
For most videographers, the R6 Mark II’s 4K capabilities will be more than sufficient, and its improved heat management makes it more reliable for long shooting sessions. However, for those pushing the boundaries of resolution and slow-motion, the R5’s 8K and 4K120 options remain unmatched.
Low-Light Performance: Thanks to its lower pixel density and newer sensor design, the R6 Mark II has a slight edge in low-light performance. Its native ISO range extends to 102400 (expandable to 204800), compared to the R5’s 51200 (expandable to 102400). This makes the R6 Mark II a better choice for event photographers, photojournalists, and anyone who frequently shoots in challenging lighting conditions.
Build Quality and Handling: Both cameras feature weather-sealed bodies and robust construction, typical of Canon’s professional-grade cameras. The R5 is slightly larger and heavier, which some photographers might prefer for balance with larger lenses. The R6 Mark II, being lighter and more compact, could be more comfortable for all-day shooting or travel photography.
The R5 boasts a higher resolution EVF (5.76M dots vs 3.69M dots) and a slightly larger, higher-resolution rear LCD. These differences might be noticeable to some users, particularly those who rely heavily on the EVF for composition and reviewing images.
Price and Value: One of the most significant factors in the “Canon R5 vs R6 Mark II” decision is the price. The R6 Mark II is considerably more affordable than the R5, making it a more accessible option for enthusiasts and professionals on a budget. For many photographers, the R6 Mark II offers the perfect balance of features and performance at a more reasonable price point.
For those who need the absolute best in resolution and video capabilities, the R5’s higher price may be justified. It’s important to consider your specific needs and budget when making this decision.
FAQS About the Canon R5 VS R6 Mark II
How does the R6 Mark II’s improved autofocus affect bird photography compared to the R5?
The R6 Mark II’s enhanced autofocus system is particularly beneficial for bird photography. Its improved subject detection and tracking capabilities make it easier to capture sharp images of birds in flight or perched. While the R5 is still excellent for bird photography, the R6 Mark II’s autofocus advancements give it a slight edge in this specific scenario.
Can the R5’s 8K video capabilities be practically utilized for wildlife documentaries?
Yes, the R5’s 8K video can be valuable for wildlife documentaries. It allows for extreme cropping and reframing in post-production without losing 4K resolution. This flexibility is particularly useful when filming unpredictable wildlife behavior. However, be mindful of storage requirements and potential overheating issues during extended shoots.
How do the R5 and R6 Mark II compare in terms of long-exposure astrophotography?
Both cameras perform well for astrophotography, but the R5’s higher resolution provides more detail in star fields and nebulae. The R6 Mark II, with its better high-ISO performance, may produce less noise in very dark conditions. Ultimately, both are capable, with the choice depending on whether you prioritize resolution (R5) or low-light performance (R6 Mark II).
Which camera is better suited for professional event photography in dimly lit venues?
The R6 Mark II has an edge for event photography in low-light conditions. Its superior high-ISO performance and improved autofocus system make it easier to capture sharp images in challenging lighting. The smaller file sizes also benefit workflow efficiency, which is crucial for event photographers who need to process large numbers of images quickly.
How do the R5 and R6 Mark II compare when using adapted EF lenses?
Both cameras work excellently with adapted EF lenses. The R5’s higher resolution may reveal more details and any potential flaws in older EF lenses. The R6 Mark II’s improved autofocus system might provide slightly better performance with older lenses, especially in continuous AF situations. Overall, both cameras offer great compatibility with the EF lens lineup.
Is there a noticeable difference in IBIS performance between the R5 and R6 Mark II for handheld macro photography?
While both cameras offer up to 8 stops of shake correction with IBIS, users have reported that the R6 Mark II’s IBIS seems slightly more effective in real-world use, particularly for macro work. This could be due to firmware improvements or slight hardware tweaks. However, the difference is minimal, and both cameras perform admirably for handheld macro photography.
How do the R5 and R6 Mark II compare in terms of flash sync speed and high-speed sync performance?
Both cameras have a maximum flash sync speed of 1/250th of a second and support high-speed sync. In practice, there’s no significant difference between the two in terms of flash photography capabilities. Both work well with Canon’s RT flash system and third-party flash solutions.
Which camera is better for creating high-resolution panoramas?
The R5 has a clear advantage for high-resolution panoramas due to its 45MP sensor. This allows for larger final images with more detail when stitching multiple shots together. While the R6 Mark II can certainly create beautiful panoramas, the R5 provides more flexibility for large prints or highly detailed panoramic images.
How do the R5 and R6 Mark II compare when shooting in extreme cold conditions?
Both cameras are weather-sealed and can handle cold conditions well. However, the R6 Mark II’s better battery life gives it a slight edge in extreme cold, as battery performance typically degrades in low temperatures. The R6 Mark II’s lower resolution sensor also generates less heat, which can be beneficial in very cold environments.
Which camera provides a better experience for adapting vintage manual focus lenses?
The R5’s higher resolution EVF provides a clearer view for manual focusing, making it slightly better for use with vintage lenses. However, the R6 Mark II’s improved focus peaking might make it easier to achieve critical focus quickly. Both cameras offer focus magnification and other manual focus aids, making them both suitable for vintage lens enthusiasts. The choice may come down to whether you prioritize EVF resolution (R5) or slightly better low-light performance (R6 Mark II) when using these lenses.
Verdict
Both the Canon R5 and R6 Mark II are exceptional cameras that showcase Canon’s commitment to innovation in the mirrorless market. The choice between them ultimately comes down to your specific needs, shooting style, and budget.